Reduction to Green's Theorem
Stoke's theorem is a direct generalization of Green's theorem.
Indeed, if we let F( x,y,z) =
á M(x,y) ,N( x,y) ,0
ñ and suppose that S
is in the xy-plane, then
Work = |  |
¶S
|
F·dr = |  |
¶S
|
á M,N
ñ ·
á dx,dy
ñ = |  |
¶S
|
Mdx+Ndy |
|
Moreover, the curl formula in this case reduces to curl( F) =
á 0,0,Nx-My
ñ and the vector surface
differential is dS =
á 0,0,1
ñ dA since the
unit surface normal to any region in the xy-plane must be the unit vector k =
á 0,0,1
ñ .
Thus, the flux of the curl of the vector field F through a
region S in the plane is
|
|
| |
|
ó õ
|
ó õ
|
S |
á 0,0,Nx-My
ñ ·
á 0,0,1
ñ dA |
| |
|
|
|
Stoke's theorem is equivalent to ''flux of curl through S =
Circulation over ¶S", which leads to
ó õ
|
ó õ
|
S |
( Nx-My) dA = |  |
¶S
|
Mdx+Ndy |
|
That is, Stoke's theorem reduces to Green's theorem in the 2-dimensional xy-plane.
EXAMPLE 2 Use Green's theorem to find the flux of F =
á x, y+z, 2x
ñ through the region S
in the xy-plane enclosed by r( t) =
át4-t2,t6-t2
ñ , t in [ 0,1] .
Solution: Since dS = kdA, the flux of F
through S is
flux = |
ó õ
|
ó õ
|
S |
á x,y+z,2x
ñ ·
á0,0,1
ñ dA = |
ó õ
|
ó õ
|
S |
2xdA |
|
If we apply Green's theorem with Nx = 2x and My = 0, then N = x2
leads to
flux = |  |
¶S
|
0dx+x2dy |
|
On the boundary curve, we have x = t4-t2 and y = t6-t2. Thus,
|
|
| |
|
|
ó õ
|
0
|
( t4-t2) 2( 6t5-2t) dt |
| |
|
|
ó õ
|
1
0
|
( 6t13+4t9-12t11+4t7-2t5) dt |
| |
|
|
æ è
|
|
6t14
14
|
+ |
4t10
10
|
- |
12t12
12
|
+ |
4t8
8
|
- |
2t6
6
|
ö ø
|
ê ê
|
1
0
|
= |
-1
210
|
|
|
|
The xy-plane is not the only flat surface in 3-dimensional
space. Other planes and surfaces yield different forms of Green's theorem.
Let's look at an example.
EXAMPLE 3 What does Stoke's theorem reduce to when S
is a region in the yz-plane?
Solution: The vector i is the surface unit normal for the
yz-plane, so dS =
á 1,0,0
ñ dAyz where dAyz is the area differential for the yz-plane. Thus,
|
|
| |
|
ó õ
|
ó õ
|
S |
áPy-Nz, Mz-Px, Nx-My
ñ ·
á1,0,0
ñ dAyz |
| |
|
|
|
Moreover, in the yz-plane, the displacement differential is dr =
á 0,dy,dz
ñ , so that the work integral reduces to
Work = |  |
¶S
|
F·dr = |  |
¶S
|
á M,N,P
ñ ·
á0, dy, dz
ñ = |  |
¶S
|
Ndy + Pdz |
|
Stoke's theorem says that ''flux through S = Work along ¶S", which in this case implies that
ó õ
|
ó õ
|
S |
( Py-Nz) dAyz = |  |
¶S
|
Ndy+Pdz |
|
Check your Reading: What is the flux of a conservative
field F through a surface S with boundary ¶S?