The Divergence Theorem and Differential Forms
Let's show that Stoke's theorem can be extended to include
integrals over solids and their boundary surfaces. To begin with, in terms
of C¥ functions x( u,v,w) , y( u,v,w) ,
and z( u,v,w) , a wedge product of a wedge product is defined
dx^dy^dz =
á xw,yw,zw
ñ ·
|
|
¶( y,z)
¶( u,v)
|
, |
¶( z,x)
¶(u,v)
|
, |
¶( x,y)
¶( u,v)
|
|
|
|
dudv dw |
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is not difficult to show that this definition extends the wedge product
in a natural way-that is, that dx^dz^dy = -dx^dy^dz, dx^dx^dz = 0, and similar for similar
expressions.
For example, if x( u,v) and y( u,v) are
functions of u and v and if z = w, then
dx^dy^dz =
á 0,0,1 ñ ·
|
|
0, 0, |
¶( x,y)
¶( u,v)
|
|
|
|
dudv dw |
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, w = z and the fact that the latter term is dA implies that
which is the volume differential dV for the solid between two
surfaces z = p( x,y) and z = q( x,y) over a region R.
Consequently, 3-forms, which are also known as volume
forms, are defined
where U( x,y,z) is a 0-form. We also define the differential
of a 2-form w = Mdy^dz+Ndz^dx+Pdx^dy to
be
dw = dM^dy^dz+dN^dz^dx+dP^dx^dy |
|
where dM, dN, and dP are differentials of the 0-forms M, N, and P, respectively.
For example, if F =
á M,N,P
ñ is a vector
field and dS =
á dy^dz,dz^dx,dx^dy
ñ is the vector surface differential of the
boundary of a solid, then
F·dS = M( x,y,z) dy^dz+N(x,y,z) dz^dx+P( x,y,z) dx^dy |
|
and differential of F·dS is thus given by
d( F·dS) |
= |
d ( Mdy^dz+Ndz^dx+Pdx^dy) |
|
= |
dM^dy^dz+dN^dz^dx+dP^dx^dy |
|
Let's calculate d( F·dS) . Since dM = Mxdx+Mydy+Mzdz, we have
dM^dy^dz |
= |
( Mxdx+Mydy+Mzdz)
^( dy^dz) |
|
= |
Mxdx^dy^dz+Mydy^dy^dz+Mzdz^dy^dz |
|
= |
Mxdx^dy^dz+0-Mzdy^dz^dz |
|
= |
Mxdx^dy^dz |
|
Similarly, all but one term in each of dN^dz^dx and dP^dx^dy vanishes, so that
d( F · dS) = Mxdx^dy^dz+Nydy^dz^dx+Pzdz^dx^dy |
|
Finally, dy^dz^dx = -dy^dx^dz = dx^dy^dz and similarly, dz^dx^dy = -dx^dz^dy = dx^dy^dz, so that
d( F · dS) |
= |
Mxdx^dy^dz+Nydx^dy^dz+Pzdx^dy^dz |
|
= |
( Mx+Ny+Pz) dx^dy^dz |
|
which is to say that d( F·dS) = div( F) dV. If we use this in the divergence theorem, then we
obtain
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
¶S
|
F · dS = |
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
S
|
div( F) dV = |
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
S
|
d( F · dS) |
|
That is, the divergence theorem is simply Stoke's theorem again, since if w = F · dS, then dw = d( F · dS) .
Stoke's Theorem: If S is a solid bounded by a surface ¶S
and if w is a 2-form, then
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
¶S
|
w = |
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
S
|
dw |
|
Let's look at an example.
EXAMPLE 4 Suppose S is the cuboid [ 0,1] ×[ 0,1] ×[ 0,1] . Apply Stoke's theorem to
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
¶S
|
y dy^dz+xz2dx^dy |
|
Solution: The boundary of the unit cube is a surface with 6 square
faces, so that direct evaluation of the integral would require 6 separate
flux integrals. However, Stoke's theorem implies that
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
¶S
|
y dy^dz+xz2dx^dy |
|
= |
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
S
|
d( y dy^dz+xz2dx^dy) |
|
|
= |
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
S
|
dy^dy^dz+d( xz2) ^dx^dy |
|
|
= |
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
S
|
z2dx^dx^dy+2xz dz^dx^dy |
|
|
= |
|
|
Since dV = dx^dy^dz, this leads to
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
¶S
|
y dy^dz+xz2dx^dy |
|
= |
|
|
= |
|
ó õ
|
1
0
|
|
ó õ
|
1
0
|
|
ó õ
|
1
0
|
2xz dzdydx |
|
|
= |
|
|
EXAMPLE 5 Let S be the solid inside the cylinder x2+y2 = 1 for z in [ 0,1] . Evaluate
Solution: Recall that dz^dy^dx = dx^dy^dz = dV, so that
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
¶S
|
z dx^dy = |
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
S
|
dz^dx^dy = |
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
|
ó õ
|
S
|
dV |
|
Since the solid is between z = 0 and z = 1 over the unit disk, D, we
have
Check your Reading: What is the volume of the cylinder in
example 5?